Men in the Bible: Cain – The Profile of A Fratricide Now Cain talked with Abel his brother; and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that…
Men in the Bible: Cain – The Profile of A Fratricide
Now Cain talked with Abel his brother; and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother and killed him. – Genesis 4:8
We are still exploring the character of Cain, the son of Adam and Eve. This term, we will be shining the spotlight on him as the first murderer and fratricide in recorded history, as seen in the Holy Bible.
Our meditation will not be on the details of his heinous act per se. Rather, we will try to explore the inner workings of his mind as they culminated into him deciding that taking someone else’s life was the best solution to calm his frayed nerves, something that no other person had done until then.
So, what could have led to Cain succumbing to the emotion that drove him to the edge? Let us examine some of the profiles below:
He was not rigorous
One of our early introductions to the person of Cain was when he was to offer a sacrifice to God. While we do not know the details of the sacrifice he offered, we know that he offered from his livestock, since he was a shepherd. We can also infer from the developments that followed the offering that Cain did not offer the same kind of quality sacrifice that his brother offered to God, and that was why he was rejected.
Now, how he picked which livestock he would offer to God betrayed that he was neither painstaking nor rigorous in his ways, and that would explain why he did not choose the choice ones among his animals as sacrifice to God.
This carefreeness on his part also betrayed a character flaw that later culminated in him committing a fratricide. Because he was not deliberate or painstaking in doing things, he also lacked the moral fortitude to control his emotions and deal with the anger and sorrow that were welling up in his heart.
Cain: The First Angry Man and His Poor Choice of Emotion
And the Lord…did not respect Cain and his offering. And Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell. So the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen?” – Genesis 4:4-6
We are continuing our exploration of the person and character of Cain, the son of Adam and Eve. Today, we will be considering his emotional constitution; he was an angry man. In fact, he was the first (hu)man in recorded history to be described as angry and sad, the synonym for a fallen countenance.
As we had read earlier, Cain got himself into this rather undesirable position because he was not deliberate in his relationship with and service to God. While his brother, Abel, went out of his way to pick the choicest among his produce as sacrifice to God, Cain did not observe such diligence. Rather, he probably chose the worst of the pack among his livestock for the sacrifice he was offering to God, which must have angered God so much that He in turn rejected both Cain and his sacrifice.
The mistake that Cain made then is easy to make nowadays when most of what we know about God is what we hear in religious gatherings, not from a disciplined study of His ways in His word. Cain probably assumed that since God was not there to see him, he could get away with just giving Him whatever he wanted. After all, it was of his own volition that he wanted to offer this sacrifice to God, not because God Himself asked for an offering.
He must have gotten wiser later when God rejected his hapless offering and dismissed him from His presence. This divine rebuttal made Cain very angry and sad, such that it showed in his expression and attitude. It is interesting to note that even his father, Adam, who was let down by his wife in the fruit-eating saga, did not become angry at her or divorce her on account of this. Or what offense was worse than the one Eve did, pressuring her husband into eating the forbidden fruit, and by so doing incurring the wrath of God?
But, Adam, even while he must have been disappointed at the turn of events and felt aggrieved by the punishment God meted out to him, he did not become angry as to cast away his wife or maltreat her for what she did. Instead, he maintained a mature disposition and even christened her a good name.
However, in the case of Cain, he reacted poorly to rejection and went down in the annals of history as the first man to be labeled as angry and sad; a poor choice of emotion indeed. Instead of asking himself some hard questions, why God would accept his brother’s offering and reject his own, he chose the easy route of anger and the path of least resistance of sadness.
Anyone can easily get angry and become sad when things are not working their way. But it takes a higher level of consciousness to choose peace over anger, joy over sadness, and a positive attitude in response to a negative development. Cain was just like most of us in this regard, and it cost him badly.
Adam – A Man of Easy Persuasion So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable…
Adam – A Man of Easy Persuasion
So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate. Then the eyes of both of them were opened, – Genesis 3:6-7
For someone whom we had earlier discussed as firm and resolute in his ways when considering his encounter with God during the partner searching episode, Adam proved to be a man of easy persuasion not many encounters later during his interaction with his wife, Eve, who got him to eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil at the center of the garden.
Perhaps, some may be disappointed at Adam, and many still blame him to date, for easily succumbing to the request of his wife. From what we had earlier read, even Eve put up a semblance of resistance in her engagement with the serpent by trying to make it realize why they were not supposed to eat the fruit from that tree. However, immediately she took it for herself and ate, it was a no-brainer that Adam was going to follow suit.
It is pertinent to note that Adam was the one God expressly forbid not to eat from the fruits of both the tree of life as well as the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 2:15-16). There was no record of God telling the woman this as she was not around when God was making the garden and putting Adam in charge. This presupposes that Adam should have shown more responsibility in his stewardship of the first warning God communicated to him.
However, perhaps he felt more affinity towards the woman whom he spent more time with than God, or because the woman’s pressure proved too unbearable for him, we may never know. What we do know is that Adam allowed himself to be persuaded into fouling the instruction of God and acting in disobedience. And that proved costly not just for both of them, but for their offspring after them from that time onward.
By not demonstrating leadership in what he was persuaded to do by his partner or responsibility towards a charge God committed to him concerning the trees, Adam painfully failed his first test of obedience and leadership. By benefit of hindsight, he must have later learned that it was not everything his partner pressured him to do that he should do, particularly when such was in direct violation of the command of God. We live life forward, but learn it backward.
Women in the Bible: Eve – A Woman that Shares So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and…
Women in the Bible: Eve – A Woman Who Shares
So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate. – Genesis 3:6
Our lesson from Eve today will focus on her sharing quality. She was a giving woman who did not hoard from her husband. How was that good? Please read along.
It takes love to give (John 3:16) and it takes a good heart to share what you could have kept for yourself alone. Eve demonstrated her love for her husband, Adam, by sharing the fruit she ate with him rather than kept it to herself alone.
Hindsight has helped us to know that she really did not do well by eating the fruit in the first place. However, without the benefit of knowing the consequences of her action, one can see the good heart of Eve as she demonstrated her affection for her husband by giving him the fruit to eat.
How is this so? The Bible says she ‘saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise’. These are all positive features that she decided to share with her husband instead of holding back. No matter what we think of her, she meant well by sharing what she thought was good stuff with her husband.
If the whole fruit-eating scenario had turned out well and hadn’t boomeranged on she and her husband’s faces, she would have been commended for her good nature. But because it did not end well, it is easy to castigate and blame her. However. the fact remains that she meant well for her husband by sharing the good, pleasant and desirable fruit with him, rather than kept it for herself alone and be helping herself to it secretly.
Another point is that, knowing that the said fruit would result in enlightenment, as it would make her wise and help her know what was good and what was evil, she wanted this for her husband as well, and that was why she shared it with him, so that they would both be wise and enlightened together. She could have opted to be the enlightened one in the family alone while the husband languished in ignorance. But she did not choose such privilege for herself alone. She wanted it for herself, and she desired it for her husband as well.
So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. – Genesis 3:6
We had earlier considered how indiscreet Eve was in her dealings with the serpent, who was well known for his craftiness. Today, we will look at how naïve she also was in playing along with the serpent without pausing to challenge its goading.
If anything, Eve was fully aware of God’s charge that the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, should not be eaten by them. The reason God gave this command was to preserve the purity and innocence of humankind so that He could continue to have unfettered fellowship with them, and they would also continue to have unhindered access to Him (Hebrews 12:14).
However, when the serpent came into the picture and started working on Eve firstly by questioning God’s command as to why they were not allowed to eat the fruit of the tree and then refuting that nothing harmful would happen to them if they eat it, a more guarded person would have paused to probe the motive of the serpent for coming to her with a different proposition other than the original instruction God handed them.
At least, Eve was not in doubt as to the greatness or benevolence of God compared to the serpent. So, it was not unbelief that made her pander to the antics of the serpent. It was probably not stubbornness either, as she was in a state of innocence at this stage and had no awareness of complex human emotions. It was sheer naivete.
Naivete, defined by Oxford Advanced Dictionary as “natural and unaffected; innocent,” was what made Eve so carefree that she did not notice the rebellious undertone in the serpent’s words or check herself to ascertain why she should do its bidding in variance with the command of God.
Moreover, it was naivete that made Eve question her own God-inspired established opinion about the tree that a tree which was before then a no-no now started looking “good for food,” “pleasant to the eyes”, and “desirable to make one wise” in her eyes that she now decided to eat it. May God keep us from temptation.
The cunning of the serpent was too much for Eve’s naïve mind, which was once granted audience, which should not have happened in the first place; she had little willpower to resist it.
Another lesson we can learn from God is His disposition to a balancing act. He is not a God of extremes. Even though some who profess to follow Him go to extremes in His name or make extreme claims on His behalf, extreme is not a label that one can pin on God. He balances the acts.
Understanding God: He is Not Moved by Sentiments
Another lesson we can learn from the personality of God is that sentiments do not move Him. Therefore, He cannot be deceived into making a wrong judgment or call, as humans tend to do.
Understanding God: He is A Creator
He is a Creator. This is not to be interpreted loosely, particularly in the light of our contemporary use of the word. God is the ultimate Creator, as He created all things, even the ends of the earth (Isaiah 40:28).
Understanding God: God of the Beginning
There is no better way to begin this journey of exploring the people and entities in the Bible than to start with God. He is not just the beginning but is the origin of all things.
Women in the Bible: A Paragon of Beauty
What made Sarah’s beauty so compelling that kings and nations took notice? Explore the deeper layers of grace, favour, and mystery surrounding one of Scripture’s most unforgettable women — and discover why her story still provokes wonder today.
Men in the Bible: A Man of Ambition and Adventure
Terah may not have reached Canaan, but his courage to start a life-changing journey laid the foundation for Abraham’s destiny. Discover how ambition and bold steps mark a life of significance.
Men in the Bible: An Impetuous and Impudent Man
A revealing glimpse into a man whose choices exposed deeper issues of character, showing how hastiness and entitlement can quietly shape a destiny, and why his story still speaks to us today.
Men in the Bible: A Man with Little Foresight
Sometimes what looks like a smart choice can hide the seed of a mistake. This reflection from Scripture invites us to think again about how foresight — or the lack of it — shapes a man’s story.
Men in the Bible: The First Man to Tithe
Before laws, temples, or traditions, one man honoured God with his substance. Abraham’s tithe was not commanded, demanded, or enforced. It flowed from reverence.
Fathers in the Bible: A Destiny-Shaping Father
What makes a man a truly aware father? Discover how one man’s prophetic foresight shaped his son’s destiny and changed generations forever.
Add Daily Dew Devotional & Inspirational to your Homescreen!
